Skip to main content

Are You a New City Sucker? 5 Questions to Ask (and Answer) for Yourself

1.  Did I attend a recent meeting for a city in my area and leave with the strange feeling that I was now obligated to pitch some kind of a pyramid scheme to my neighbors that I don't even fully understand myself?                  

2.  Did I attend a recent meeting for a city in my area but leave without any real tangible facts that I can verify on my own?   How do I know that I can trust that what I heard as the answers to my questions was the same understanding that others may have left with when they asked the same or similar questions?

3.  Is a word of mouth campaign (asking me to tell five others and then they tell five others, etc.) viewed as a reliable method for the dissemination of factual data by current government entities or even in corporate America?  Wouldn't an actual copy of a proposed city charter or a fact sheet approved by the sponsoring legislator be more appropriate for this important of an issue?


4.   If I accidentally pass along information that is not correct or if the terms of the city charter change before the issue makes it to a ballot, who will be held accountable for the broken promises?  How will my neighborhood be able to recoup on a promise that was only made orally to me and a few others?


5.  How do I really feel about what is taking place?  Why was I asked to get involved now and not earlier when the city bills were actually before the House and Senate?   How sure am I that my loyalty to my political party is not being abused by those who could easily have other motivations (financial or otherwise) for what they are asking me to do?


IT ALL COMES DOWN TO THIS ...  

What would I tell my child / parent / sibling / friend or neighbor if he/she was considering taking on a huge financial burden in their own lives that would take years upon years to repay or might not ever be repaid in my loved one's lifetime?  If they were to ask for my advice, what would I say?   Can I really and truly back a plan that requires great fiscal risk and has the potential to negatively impact so many people financially as well as in terms of their quality of life.  

Would I buy a used car with so little documentation or with a process that seems to change the rules based on whichever customer or new face just walked in the door?  


If I think of the community of Tucker  as if it were my own child or grandchild who was turning to me, asking me to make the right decision in order to protect him / her from harm, would I be certain that the choice to support a city (of any name) is the right and proper decision  to make, under the current circumstances?  Or would I tell my child / grandchild that I need more information and we should not rush into anything if we are not completely sure that it is the right thing to do?






Residents of Tucker, this community is your baby / grandbaby.    Please do not rush into a choice that will throw the baby out with the bathwater.   Generations that have come before us are counting on us to do the right thing.  Generations that will come after us will forever have us to either thank or blame for how we handle this challenge that has been placed before us.

Whatever we do, let's all agree that if we act in the best interest of "Tucker" as a whole, then we cannot possibly be misled or swayed by the promises or threats being lobbied by those who do not live here. 

Popular posts from this blog

Welcome to Smoke Rise, Soon to be Tucker, GA

This could be the change that residents will see if Tucker 2015 is successful in getting its referendum nto a ballot and voters approve it.  The driving force behind the city of Tucker has been the leadership within the community known as "Smoke Rise, GA."  Smoke Rise residents currently have addresses that say "Stone Mountain, GA" and many of them worked hard in order to create a separate identity for themselves, petitioning the U.S. Post Office to change their official name to "Smoke Rise."  While the Post Office did not agree to change the official name, they did agree to allow "Smoke Rise" as a recognized alternative to "Stone Mountain" that could be used interchangeably as long as it accompanied their 30087 zip code. It is important to note that these residents did not ask the Post Office to recognize their use of "Tucker" as an acceptable alternative.  They asked to be called "Smoke Rise." It appears t...

Mr. Levitas, Did You Know Where Tucker Was When You Represented It?

From the time of the first announcement ever made about a "Lakeside City" (now called "Lavista Hills), we heard the name "Kevin Levitas" associated with it. It wasn't clear if he was the leader or if it was Mary Kay Woodworth, or possibly both of them together in a typical PTA type of shared credit, deflected blame.  But, what we did NOT know until much later was the very long standing love/hate relationship that Mr. Levitas has with our community. We don't know or understand all the factors that have gone into his crusade to destroy Tucker any more than we can understand a politician who switches parties but maintains that his own philosophy on life has remained the same (which was also something Levitas did, along with others including our own Governor of Georgia). But, what is downright outrageous and possibly even deceptive to our Central Dekalb citizens is the fact that Levitas, who has publicly stated his confusion over what exactly is a...

Petition Signers Say They Were Tricked by "Neighbors for Lakeside City"

Sen. Millar Sen. Millar should know better.  When he claimed that 80% of the Livsey precinct wants to be in the City of Lavista Hills (aka Lakeside City), he already knew that there are people claiming the petition takers lied and even harassed them in order to get them to sign.  Some said they were made promises having to do with attendance zones and Lakeside High School.  Some even said they were told the only referendum would be the Lakeside one so it would be the only way to have a vote at all. In short, they were sold a bill of goods by some people whom they can never actually hold accountable and might not ever even see again.  Some of the petition signers spoke limited English and later said they signed just to stop the person from returning to their home every day to ask if they had changed their minds and were ready to sign. High pressure, low morals.  Great combination for disaster.   And, this "Neighbors for Lakeside" group that was tak...