Skip to main content

Rep. Tom Taylor Tells Dunwoody How Economics is Driving His Desire for Changes to Our School System


Transcribed from a Dunwoody coffee talk held by Nancy Jester last year, Rep. Tom Taylor (the sponsor of the bill for Lavista Hills) says that "they" (Dunwoody) have great schools and its the rest of DeKalb that has a problem.

Save Tucker! contends that it is EXACTLY this type of thinking that is preventing our system from improving.  When you have the cream of the crop of 100,000 students to pick and choose from, of course your schools will be better than the ones you plucked them from.  

Rep. Taylor's speech, in part:


 
" ...  I am also on the economic development committee... we were down at Gulfstream in Savannah which is a aircraft manufacturer, just a jewel for the state of Georgia and they have a seven year backlog of orders.  Their average, entry-level aircraft is about $65 million dollars.  They employ a lot of people.  They don't employ a lot of people from Georgia.
 And, at the end of the conversation we had with the top three business executives, we asked, "You've got this beautiful business, what can we do?"
And all three of them said, "Education.  You've got to do something about education."

Kia - We've got a great program in Georgia called  "Quick Start."  It trains workers and basically selects them and actually ... when when I went down to Kia and more than half the license plates in their parking lot are from Alabama. 
Third thing, SB 70, remove the entire school system, a lot of pushback. Atlanta is Georgia.  Worldwide Headquarters, UPS  - they say Atlanta.

HR 46, I dropped last session, pretty well received ... except a few not receiving it well. The last you hear is "we don't have to educate children."

Governor removed the DeKalb County School System.  Out of the 23 member of the the status quo - which was failing.  That is unacceptable.
Back in 1983:  180 school systems in Georgia, which is 159 counties and 21 city school systems...

End of the day, we've got great schools here in Dunwoody, but we're part of a system that's failing.

And it does affect us from an economic development standpoint because we're looking and here we've got:  Great CID, Dunwoody, great place from an economic standpoint, but you've got to do something about  your school system."

So, what does he do?  He plans to abandon it.  He wants Dunwoody to have its own system.  And now he is helping Lavista Hills by sponsoring a bill for cityhood.  Does he really want to help them, or does he just need their votes on his city school system bill?  Can Lavista Hills, Tucker or any other city in DeKalb, besides Dunwoody and possibly Brookhaven, actually support their own school system?   Or, is the promise being made to every community that they, too, can have great things if they jump on board and follow the same plan?

We all know that the rest of DeKalb doesn't have the same kind of income and growth that Dunwoody has experienced with the help of Perimeter Center.  We also know that things have not always been as easy for them as they would like us to believe.

If you plan to vote for a city simply based on the "idea" of getting a school system separate from what we have in DeKalb, then you are taking a big risk ... with other people's money.  Government isn't intended to be something that works just for you.  It is supposed to work the same way for everyone.

Is it?

Popular posts from this blog

Taxpayers and Voters are Unhappy with Commissioner Barnes-Sutton:

IMPORTANT RUNOFF ELECTIONTUESDAY, JULY 26!  DEKALB COUNTY'S DISTRICT 4 CHOOSES BETWEEN INCUMBENT BARNES-SUTTON OR CHALLENGER BRADSHAW! 

If you DID NOT vote in the last election, do not despair, you can STILL VOTE in the July 26 Runoff so long as  you were registered to vote at the time of the first election.  To have a say in this runoff, you will need to ask for a "Democratic ballot" for you to cast your vote on.

From the desk of the group "Unhappy Taxpayers and Voters," we received the following:

To DeKalb Teachers and Georgia Teachers:

Commissioner Sharon Barnes Sutton (of the 4th District in DeKalb County) has a long history of arriving to work late (Commission meetings and/or committee meetings) and/or not showing up at all. We ask that you review the following records (prior performance and work history/records of arriving to work on time and/or showing up) and ask if teachers that are not elected officials could get away with the same violations:

How ma…

Tucker Behaving Badly

Newly elected Tucker Mayor Frank Auman (center) and four council-members were sworn in to their positions on March 8 at Tucker High School.  The council members represented exactly 2 of the 3 districts.  Despite the fact that they were not bound by any particular charter requirement to do so, they decided to move forward without the conclusion of District 2's election, which was held over by the need for a runoff.

When met with objections, they promptly began holding meetings anyway.  And they hired staff members, specifically lawyers, more specifically lawyers who are experts in election laws and understanding the charter. 

The seats for District 2 were decided in a runoff election March 29. And April 1, the results were deemed finalized by the Elections Supervisor in DeKalb County.  A separate swearing in ceremony was held at Tucker Recreation Center for them.

When Auman was elected mayor, he said his first goal is to build a foundation for the city.
“We have to get the rev…

Tucker Township? A Vision or a Pipe Dream?

Who drew this map?  We are not really sure.  We stumbled upon it recently while looking for Tucker election results. We do, however, think this map, called "Tucker Township" actually shows a good compromise between Tucker and Lavista Hills that could have worked well for everyone.   It offers a great way to share the Northlake area commercial tax revenue.  So, why didn't anyone suggest something like this  prior to putting forth competing bills in the 2013 and 2014 legislative sessions?  And, why is Tucker's city still being allowed to move forward when it has been called "unconstitutional" by even the legislators who supported it?
Limited services government in the form of a new city is something that the Georgia constitution does not allow, apparently.  But, unless citizens decide to fight the creation of Tucker or Peachtree Corners, two of such limited cities are going to continue operating until someone tells them that they cannot.  
Save Tucker…