Skip to main content

Why I’m Against Cityhood

By Robert Stamper of Smoke Rise

This article originally appeared in the October issue of Smoke Signal, a newsletter for the Smoke Rise community.  As a side note, Smoke Rise is also the neighborhood of former commissioner Elaine Boyer, Interim Superintendent Michael Thurmond, Tucker 2015 Chairman and Lobbyist Frank Auman, Tucker Business leader Honey Van de Kreke, and former School Board Representative Pam Speaks.  

1. The cityhood effort is the most divisive phenomenon I have seen in my 40 years in this community. Regardless of its stated goals, cityhood in DeKalb plainly and effectively separates the last majority-white areas of the county from a huge swath of territory populated largely by African Americans.

As a former M-to-M student of both Tucker and Towers high schools, and as the father of a fourth-generation resident of Smoke Rise, let me make clear that the obvious, and pathetic, racial element of the cityhood push is an embarrassment. It is in no way consistent with the family and community values with which I and my classmates were raised. Even if for no other reason, the ethnic separatism aspect of the incorporation efforts demands they be stopped.

2. For those of us who were raised here it's difficult to believe this has to be said, but misguided assertions from the past year or so (though, tellingly, not once before) underscore the necessity: Smoke Rise is not located in Tucker. The area now referred to as Smoke Rise is in Stone Mountain, and always has been. This isn't just a mailing address. It's our hometown.

Stone Mountain, both incorporated and unincorporated, has seen hard times over the recent past, no question. For those of us whose bond to this place is guided by family history and tradition, and by principles of loyalty and integrity, we respond by strengthening and redoubling our sense of community.

3. Tucker cityhood, specifically, is a bad deal, not just ideologically but financially. The "Feasibility Study" laying out plans for Tucker city government shows that expenditures related to the city's mayor, city council and admin are slated to exceed five million dollars per annum--and that's not even counting costs for the only three services the city will provide (code enforcement, zoning and parks). Police service does not change. Schools do not change. Regardless of marketing to the contrary, Tucker cityhood gives this area a new layer of government administration in addition to those we already have, with millions of dollars in new fees, and with a new corps of elected officials and bureaucrats, at a total cost to taxpayers of $16.6 million per year--all while doing little or nothing to solve current issues with DeKalb government.

4. There is an alternative. We can work together, across DeKalb, as a community, to fix our problems. Black and white, majority and minority, north and south, affluent and struggling, we can choose--guided by the values we work to instill in our children--to unite rather than divide, and to rebuild rather than repel. Our history as a nation is one of greater unity, deeper understanding, and better fellowship, often secured at great cost. E pluribus unum, never ex uno plures.

The last thing DeKalb needs in this difficult time is more division. Please make sure our legislators understand. Thank you.

Popular posts from this blog

Welcome to Smoke Rise, Soon to be Tucker, GA

The driving force behind the city of Tucker has been the leadership within the community known as "Smoke Rise, GA."  Smoke Rise residents currently have addresses that say "Stone Mountain, GA" and many of them worked hard in order to create a separate identity for themselves, petitioning the U.S. Post Office to change their official name to "Smoke Rise."  While the Post Office did not agree to change the official name, they did agree to allow "Smoke Rise" as a recognized alternative to "Stone Mountain" that could be used interchangeably as long as it accompanied their 30087 zip code.

It is important to note that these residents did not ask the Post Office to recognize their use of "Tucker" as an acceptable alternative.  They asked to be called "Smoke Rise."

It appears that zip codes and address labels are important to them, just as our Tucker zip code is important to us.  And, while we do understand that Smoke Rise…

Tucker Behaving Badly

Newly elected Tucker Mayor Frank Auman (center) and four council-members were sworn in to their positions on March 8 at Tucker High School.  The council members represented exactly 2 of the 3 districts.  Despite the fact that they were not bound by any particular charter requirement to do so, they decided to move forward without the conclusion of District 2's election, which was held over by the need for a runoff.

When met with objections, they promptly began holding meetings anyway.  And they hired staff members, specifically lawyers, more specifically lawyers who are experts in election laws and understanding the charter. 

The seats for District 2 were decided in a runoff election March 29. And April 1, the results were deemed finalized by the Elections Supervisor in DeKalb County.  A separate swearing in ceremony was held at Tucker Recreation Center for them.

When Auman was elected mayor, he said his first goal is to build a foundation for the city.
“We have to get the rev…

Tucker Township? A Vision or a Pipe Dream?

Who drew this map?  We are not really sure.  We stumbled upon it recently while looking for Tucker election results. We do, however, think this map, called "Tucker Township" actually shows a good compromise between Tucker and Lavista Hills that could have worked well for everyone.   It offers a great way to share the Northlake area commercial tax revenue.  So, why didn't anyone suggest something like this  prior to putting forth competing bills in the 2013 and 2014 legislative sessions?  And, why is Tucker's city still being allowed to move forward when it has been called "unconstitutional" by even the legislators who supported it?
Limited services government in the form of a new city is something that the Georgia constitution does not allow, apparently.  But, unless citizens decide to fight the creation of Tucker or Peachtree Corners, two of such limited cities are going to continue operating until someone tells them that they cannot.  
Save Tucker…