Skip to main content

Press Release Re: Open Government Complaint Filed by Save Tucker!

CONTACT:  770-496-4495

OCTOBER 3, 2014:  TUCKER, GA:   A group of residents in Tucker, GA, today filed an Open Government Complaint with the State Attorney General’s Office over the lack of transparency in the city formation process in Central Dekalb County.  The group, known as “Save Tucker!” says they are fed up with the lack of information they are receiving from Tucker 2014, Tucker 2015, Tucker Together,  City of Briarcliff and Lakeside City, who are advocating a pro-city stance in Central DeKalb while living off public funds in order to do so.   And, they are fed up with their locally elected representatives who cannot seem to put their hands on the data either, despite having voted or come close to voting on the subject in committee at the end of the last session at the Capitol.

When  they heard the bills were either killed in committee or  pulled by the author, they say they breathed a sigh of relief.   But, it did not last long.    The city groups may have new names, but the faces and mission are the same:    divide and conquer.

The leaders of Save Tucker! say that their group started in March 2013 when they  learned that a map for a city of Lakeside  claimed about 40 percent of the Tucker community as their own, essentially leaving Tucker without hope of every becoming a city.   That would have been $22 million more dollars out of the county coffers, according to an estimate provided by the County Commissioner’s office.

Save Tucker! is hoping that the state Attorney General’s Open Government Mediation Program will help them to gain the answers to questions they have about the proposed cities and why the state and the county are rewriting laws just to serve these groups.

“They keep asking taxpayers in Tucker to support their efforts to incorporate, but they haven’t made their documentation public,” says one member.  “We have requested  copies of a proposed charter document, any updated boundary maps and the feasibility reports to show us whether the tax base can support what they say it can.  And we want to see a list of the donors to make sure they are really residents of our communities and not just some attorney’s  donation they will expect to be paid back upon taking office."

The group also takes issue with the process outlined by the House committee that directs the groups to meet privately, rather than with a professional arbitrator.

“The residents in Tucker have been clear from the very beginning of this whole mess,” says Cheryl Miller, one of the group’s founders.

 “Protect our boundaries.  That’s what everyone keeps saying but no one is listening.  Clearly, this system doesn’t even have reigns to hand over.  It’s that bad.”

The Open Government Mediation Program is a service of the Attorney General's office designed to assist members of the public whose local governments may not be complying with requirements of the Open Meetings Act or the Open Records Act.

Popular posts from this blog

Welcome to Smoke Rise, Soon to be Tucker, GA

The driving force behind the city of Tucker has been the leadership within the community known as "Smoke Rise, GA."  Smoke Rise residents currently have addresses that say "Stone Mountain, GA" and many of them worked hard in order to create a separate identity for themselves, petitioning the U.S. Post Office to change their official name to "Smoke Rise."  While the Post Office did not agree to change the official name, they did agree to allow "Smoke Rise" as a recognized alternative to "Stone Mountain" that could be used interchangeably as long as it accompanied their 30087 zip code.

It is important to note that these residents did not ask the Post Office to recognize their use of "Tucker" as an acceptable alternative.  They asked to be called "Smoke Rise."

It appears that zip codes and address labels are important to them, just as our Tucker zip code is important to us.  And, while we do understand that Smoke Rise…

Tucker Township? A Vision or a Pipe Dream?

Who drew this map?  We are not really sure.  We stumbled upon it recently while looking for Tucker election results. We do, however, think this map, called "Tucker Township" actually shows a good compromise between Tucker and Lavista Hills that could have worked well for everyone.   It offers a great way to share the Northlake area commercial tax revenue.  So, why didn't anyone suggest something like this  prior to putting forth competing bills in the 2013 and 2014 legislative sessions?  And, why is Tucker's city still being allowed to move forward when it has been called "unconstitutional" by even the legislators who supported it?
Limited services government in the form of a new city is something that the Georgia constitution does not allow, apparently.  But, unless citizens decide to fight the creation of Tucker or Peachtree Corners, two of such limited cities are going to continue operating until someone tells them that they cannot.  
Save Tucker…

Tucker Behaving Badly

Newly elected Tucker Mayor Frank Auman (center) and four council-members were sworn in to their positions on March 8 at Tucker High School.  The council members represented exactly 2 of the 3 districts.  Despite the fact that they were not bound by any particular charter requirement to do so, they decided to move forward without the conclusion of District 2's election, which was held over by the need for a runoff.

When met with objections, they promptly began holding meetings anyway.  And they hired staff members, specifically lawyers, more specifically lawyers who are experts in election laws and understanding the charter. 

The seats for District 2 were decided in a runoff election March 29. And April 1, the results were deemed finalized by the Elections Supervisor in DeKalb County.  A separate swearing in ceremony was held at Tucker Recreation Center for them.

When Auman was elected mayor, he said his first goal is to build a foundation for the city.
“We have to get the rev…