Skip to main content

The Briarcliff Hearing: Public Comments, TellTale Signs That a City in Central DeKalb Will Fail at the Ballot Box

The common theme among the public comments from the city of Briarcliff hearings: "Please, give us all the right to vote. The right to vote NO."

 


Highlights:  

  1. Emory says "No" to "Lakeside" and "Let us vote," to Briarcliff.  
  2.  Young Republican smiles at thought of what this does to Jason Carter's "epicenter of support."  Committee Chairman cuts him short.
  3. Long time resident and daughter of a builder from Leafmore states Tucker has always had property inside the perimeter and residents are all friendly with one another.
  4. Druid Hills Past President speaks to desire for preservation of history and land.  States they funded the Briarcliff study and large number of residents want the right to vote.
  5.  Another resident left out of Lakeside wants the right to vote.
  6. Neighborhood in Lavista Park sends association President to ask for right to vote.
  7. Another resident against Lakeside hopes Briarcliff and Tucker can work together.
  8. A Druid Hills resident says he wanted to remain unincorporated but after seeing the back room agenda going on, he would support the Briarcliff over Lakeside so everyone can vote. 
  9. Another resident asks for right to vote and questions the "economies of scale" in play here.
  10. A Republican from Druid Hills with long history in the area supports Briarcliff as it is more inclusive.  
  11. Another resident wants the right to vote
  12. Support for Briarcliff.
  13. A resident of DeKalb who believes the perimeter should be a boundary.
  14. Support for a moratorium on cities and asks for a better process and for county to be fixed.
  15. Resident of DeKalb supports moratorium because doesn't believe citizens are being fully informed and county should be fixed first.
  16. Resident of Tucker offers committee chairman a book on the history of Tucker.  She already has it.  He asks committee to "please don't take away our land" and wishes everyone would just leave us alone.  "It's not fair to take our footprint away that's been here for 121 years."
  17. Resident says his neighborhood is somewhat resentful that the commercial area they support will be taken for a city that they won't be a part of.  They all want to vote.
  18. Atlanta native says "everyone deserves the right to vote."
  19. Smoke Rise residents says Tucker has offered to give up inside the perimeter in exchange for Lakeside giving up the outside of the perimeter.  He states he is a "member" of Tucker 2014, but his name was not on any of the lists of board members.  He is now the  President of Tucker 2015 and is the former leader of the DeKalb County Republican Party.  Says that some accused them of being a democratic organization trying to 'gum up the works.'  
  20. Residents asks committee not to draw divisive lines.

The end of the Public Comments portion.  Not once did a single person from the general public comment about their services from DeKalb County or what they believed a city could do better for them.  The main reason for wanting a city - any city - did not seem to be a part of any of the discussions and mostly the residents wanted to have a process that worked for everyone.

THANK YOU DEKALB COUNTY RESIDENTS FOR SHOWING UP AND SPEAKING UP! 

United we stand, divided we fall.

Popular posts from this blog

Taxpayers and Voters are Unhappy with Commissioner Barnes-Sutton:

IMPORTANT RUNOFF ELECTIONTUESDAY, JULY 26!  DEKALB COUNTY'S DISTRICT 4 CHOOSES BETWEEN INCUMBENT BARNES-SUTTON OR CHALLENGER BRADSHAW! 

If you DID NOT vote in the last election, do not despair, you can STILL VOTE in the July 26 Runoff so long as  you were registered to vote at the time of the first election.  To have a say in this runoff, you will need to ask for a "Democratic ballot" for you to cast your vote on.

From the desk of the group "Unhappy Taxpayers and Voters," we received the following:

To DeKalb Teachers and Georgia Teachers:

Commissioner Sharon Barnes Sutton (of the 4th District in DeKalb County) has a long history of arriving to work late (Commission meetings and/or committee meetings) and/or not showing up at all. We ask that you review the following records (prior performance and work history/records of arriving to work on time and/or showing up) and ask if teachers that are not elected officials could get away with the same violations:

How ma…

Tucker Behaving Badly

Newly elected Tucker Mayor Frank Auman (center) and four council-members were sworn in to their positions on March 8 at Tucker High School.  The council members represented exactly 2 of the 3 districts.  Despite the fact that they were not bound by any particular charter requirement to do so, they decided to move forward without the conclusion of District 2's election, which was held over by the need for a runoff.

When met with objections, they promptly began holding meetings anyway.  And they hired staff members, specifically lawyers, more specifically lawyers who are experts in election laws and understanding the charter. 

The seats for District 2 were decided in a runoff election March 29. And April 1, the results were deemed finalized by the Elections Supervisor in DeKalb County.  A separate swearing in ceremony was held at Tucker Recreation Center for them.

When Auman was elected mayor, he said his first goal is to build a foundation for the city.
“We have to get the rev…

Tucker Township? A Vision or a Pipe Dream?

Who drew this map?  We are not really sure.  We stumbled upon it recently while looking for Tucker election results. We do, however, think this map, called "Tucker Township" actually shows a good compromise between Tucker and Lavista Hills that could have worked well for everyone.   It offers a great way to share the Northlake area commercial tax revenue.  So, why didn't anyone suggest something like this  prior to putting forth competing bills in the 2013 and 2014 legislative sessions?  And, why is Tucker's city still being allowed to move forward when it has been called "unconstitutional" by even the legislators who supported it?
Limited services government in the form of a new city is something that the Georgia constitution does not allow, apparently.  But, unless citizens decide to fight the creation of Tucker or Peachtree Corners, two of such limited cities are going to continue operating until someone tells them that they cannot.  
Save Tucker…